Aside from how much it would cost to get all the way over there firstcowboy71 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:40 pm Royal Caribbean sail out of Australia :)
But not the same class as 70k. Quantum and Voyager class ships at the moment I believe.
How cool would it be to have 70K sail from Australia? Would not actually be THAT much of a financial hit for people from the USA as the US exchange rate is super-strong against the Australia dollar at the moment.
Problem with a cruise FROM Canada, is where would it sail TO?Metalhead_80s wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:58 pm I remember an interview where Andy mentioned potentially having a sister cruise out of Canada. Vancouver, if I'm not mistaken.
It's not just Europeans. Even Canadians are fed up with all the tariff nonsense and 'globalist' rhetoric. When you talk about how crappy the world is treating your country and start threatening all sorts of things because of it, people don't want to come visit you as much if they don't already have something committed.
That. one million per cent. THAT.toby wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 11:56 amIt's not just Europeans. Even Canadians are fed up with all the tariff nonsense and 'globalist' rhetoric. When you talk about how crappy the world is treating your country and start threatening all sorts of things because of it, people don't want to come visit you as much if they don't already have something committed.
Imagine if the same French scientist did the same thing attending a conference in North Korea or many other parts of the world , the scientist would have been probably treated much less kindly than the reception by the USAGodflesh wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:56 pm A French scientist going to a conference in Texas last week was randomly searched, not only denied entry but arrested, accused of "terrorism", detained overnight, and they confiscated his phone and laptop due to "messages criticizing Trump's policies on his phone":
https://www.lbc.co.uk/world-news/diplom ... rorism-us/
Imagine an alternate reality where you have to compare the US to North Korea to find a positive comparison.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:23 amImagine if the same French scientist did the same thing attending a conference in North Korea or many other parts of the world , the scientist would have been probably treated much less kindly than the reception by the USA.Godflesh wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:56 pm A French scientist going to a conference in Texas last week was randomly searched, not only denied entry but arrested, accused of "terrorism", detained overnight, and they confiscated his phone and laptop due to "messages criticizing Trump's policies on his phone":
https://www.lbc.co.uk/world-news/diplom ... rorism-us/
I still find USA to be the best country in the world, with or without the North Korea comparison . I have been on 70000 Tons during President Trump first administration and everything was just fine on the cruises at those times .toby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:23 amImagine an alternate reality where you have to compare the US to North Korea to find a positive comparison.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:23 amImagine if the same French scientist did the same thing attending a conference in North Korea or many other parts of the world , the scientist would have been probably treated much less kindly than the reception by the USA.Godflesh wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:56 pm A French scientist going to a conference in Texas last week was randomly searched, not only denied entry but arrested, accused of "terrorism", detained overnight, and they confiscated his phone and laptop due to "messages criticizing Trump's policies on his phone":
https://www.lbc.co.uk/world-news/diplom ... rorism-us/
One of the things that always made the US great was the freedom to be able to criticize whoever is in power and point out what they could be doing better. The point is that we are apparently no longer that country. Just because you haven't experienced it YET does not mean that you won't experience it. Those times are not today.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:26 amI still find USA to be the best country in the world, with or without the North Korea comparison . I have been on 70000 Tons during President Trump first administration and everything was just fine on the cruises at those times .toby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:23 amImagine an alternate reality where you have to compare the US to North Korea to find a positive comparison.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:23 am
Imagine if the same French scientist did the same thing attending a conference in North Korea or many other parts of the world , the scientist would have been probably treated much less kindly than the reception by the USA.
Exactly. Let's keep this forum civilized, people. I'd rather stay out of politics here, but that is just my preferencemetalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 am It is great this forum exists and people can interact respectfully with one another, even those we have different perspectives from , without ridicule or condemnation and share different thoughts , feelings and ideas in a positive manner. And at times simply agree to disagree with.
I agree it is preferable to me to stay away from politics and religion on here , to the extent possible , regardless of the point of view someone is coming from .cegr80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:57 amExactly. Let's keep this forum civilized, people. I'd rather stay out of politics here, but that is just my preferencemetalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 am It is great this forum exists and people can interact respectfully with one another, even those we have different perspectives from , without ridicule or condemnation and share different thoughts , feelings and ideas in a positive manner. And at times simply agree to disagree with.
I've said the most I'm comfortable saying that's brushed up against politics. lol I don't get into personalities anyway. Policy matters are more my thing.cegr80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:57 amExactly. Let's keep this forum civilized, people. I'd rather stay out of politics here, but that is just my preferencemetalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 am It is great this forum exists and people can interact respectfully with one another, even those we have different perspectives from , without ridicule or condemnation and share different thoughts , feelings and ideas in a positive manner. And at times simply agree to disagree with.
Any policy put in place is generated from people creating them . So indirectly the “ personalities “ are being referenced if you agree or disagree with a position, there is always a human being behind it . No A-I created laws or regulations yet only people and their personalities.toby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:28 amI've said the most I'm comfortable saying that's brushed up against politics. lol I don't get into personalities anyway. Policy matters are more my thing.cegr80 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:57 amExactly. Let's keep this forum civilized, people. I'd rather stay out of politics here, but that is just my preferencemetalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:20 am It is great this forum exists and people can interact respectfully with one another, even those we have different perspectives from , without ridicule or condemnation and share different thoughts , feelings and ideas in a positive manner. And at times simply agree to disagree with.
My point is that it's ultimately not the person that I choose to criticize. If people can't separate their personalities from their positions, that's more their issue. If I appreciate a song or an album by a band, that doesn't mean that I support everything they do. And by that same token, if I don't appreciate a song or an album by a band, that doesn't mean I oppose everything they do. Just because I love the first few Metallica albums, I don't have to like St. Anger or LuLu. I would hope none of us is that one-dimensional.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:37 amAny policy put in place is generated from people creating them . So indirectly the “ personalities “ are being referenced if you agree or disagree with a position, there is always a human being behind it . No A-I created laws or regulations yet only people and their personalities.
You do make some interesting points. I get what you mean especially with framing it with the Metallica references . As always good communicating with you.toby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:58 amMy point is that it's ultimately not the person that I choose to criticize. If people can't separate their personalities from their positions, that's more their issue. If I appreciate a song or an album by a band, that doesn't mean that I support everything they do. And by that same token, if I don't appreciate a song or an album by a band, that doesn't mean I oppose everything they do. Just because I love the first few Metallica albums, I don't have to like St. Anger or LuLu. I would hope none of us is that one-dimensional.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:37 amAny policy put in place is generated from people creating them . So indirectly the “ personalities “ are being referenced if you agree or disagree with a position, there is always a human being behind it . No A-I created laws or regulations yet only people and their personalities.
Yeah, now go enjoy Hell's Heroes. lolmetalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 12:20 pmYou do make some interesting points. I get what you mean especially with framing it with the Metallica references . As always good communicating with you.toby wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:58 amMy point is that it's ultimately not the person that I choose to criticize. If people can't separate their personalities from their positions, that's more their issue. If I appreciate a song or an album by a band, that doesn't mean that I support everything they do. And by that same token, if I don't appreciate a song or an album by a band, that doesn't mean I oppose everything they do. Just because I love the first few Metallica albums, I don't have to like St. Anger or LuLu. I would hope none of us is that one-dimensional.metalforever wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:37 am
Any policy put in place is generated from people creating them . So indirectly the “ personalities “ are being referenced if you agree or disagree with a position, there is always a human being behind it . No A-I created laws or regulations yet only people and their personalities.
I am curious and interested as to what you feel are your top 3 concerns from a European perspective with attending the cruise in 2026 compared to the past 8 times that you say you have attended ? Also what country in Europe are you from ?Tuco wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 3:46 pm It's not a matter of politics or politicians, or which country's the best ,or if my dad can beat your dad! It's a matter af things we have to take into consideration before booking a very expensive trip to/on the other side of The Atalantic. While things may or may not have changed in the US they certainly have here in Europe. This year has been the most dramatic since the berlin Wall fell, and it would be naive of us to not take that uncertainty into the equation.
I've been on 8 cruises and enjoyed every bit of it. This time we've gathered a crew of 8 representing (almost) the entire political spectrum. We've agreed to see how things are working out and hoping that things will calm down before bands and tickets are announced. That's also why I think our dear skipper will delay the first announcements (it will be difficult for him to delay the last announcements....).
Welcome back , it seems you have been gone for a while.MuzakMaker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 10:46 am Awww, you guys got political without me![]()
Even as an American there's a lot of things that come in to play whether or not I can go to a US based cruise.
I got flagged coming back from the last boat by CBP by one of the new policies but was lucky that I got an agent who is overworked and underpaid who just looked at the screen, looked at my paperwork, looked at me, and said "I don't give a fuck, it's not like they could do much that they couldn't have done before they left"
International travel no matter the country and their politics is always a series of questions and concerns to be addressed. Right now, US is going through a MASSIVE policy shift, even more so than the last Trump presidency. And the "checks and balances" are regularly ignored which means a lot of those aforementioned questions and concerns are more in the forefront of everyone's minds
Back in 2022 I realized I had a free weekend and flew over to Montreal. Didn't really worry about much. Now, there's a whole calculus that takes place and that's JUST US to CA for a weekend. A lot more involved now, I can't blame anyone no matter the country of origin who is reconsidering everything. Especially with 70K not exactly being a cheap vacation.
Thanks and yeah, life and work are busy right now and there's not much happening in the 70K camp until line up starts dropping (and I was definitely overly optimist with my guess) so I'm not opening the forum nearly as much and have been commenting even lessmetalforever wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 11:49 amWelcome back , it seems you have been gone for a while.
I am curious and interested as to what you feel are your top 3 concerns from a European perspective with attending the cruise in 2026 compared to the past 8 times that you say you have attended ? Also what country in Europe are you from ?
Fascinating. And, you're an American. Is that something you can elucidate on?MuzakMaker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 10:46 am
Even as an American there's a lot of things that come in to play whether or not I can go to a US based cruise.
I got flagged coming back from the last boat by CBP by one of the new policies but was lucky that I got an agent who is overworked and underpaid who just looked at the screen, looked at my paperwork, looked at me, and said "I don't give a fuck, it's not like they could do much that they couldn't have done before they left"
Not really, no. There will be no issue to get into the country and the experience being there will be mostly uninfluenced by the politics.
Typically the charter agreement (and US law) requires that there be at least 1 non-US port required for docking. So, the only option would be to redirect to a different port should it come to that. There are plenty of options to fulfill that requirement. Absolute worst case would probably be something like Nassau. So, I really don't see that as cancelling the cruise even if Labadee wasn't available for whatever reason.AverageMetalDrummer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 7:09 am I just read an article discussing the possibility of gangs completely seizing power over the Haitian government. Some think this is becoming a real possibility, with reports stating criminal organizations are working to take control of the transitional government. My heart goes out to the people there; I truly hope the mission to take down the gangs is eventually successful.
While this idea has circulated before, I wonder what UMC’s response will be if the worst happens. I doubt that Labadee would be “safe” with Haiti under gang control. The agreement RC has with Haiti may become null and void. If Labadee becomes an unviable destination, what happens? Do we change destinations? Do we just float around for four days without a port day (I wouldn’t mind this at all)? Is the cruise canceled? I hope it’s not the latter. Thoughts?
Great insight, I honestly had no clue what would happen. I’m at the point now where port locations don’t matter much to me. If it’s a truly shitty destination, I’ll just stay on the boat and rest like I did this year.toby wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 9:05 amTypically the charter agreement (and US law) requires that there be at least 1 non-US port required for docking. So, the only option would be to redirect to a different port should it come to that. There are plenty of options to fulfill that requirement. Absolute worst case would probably be something like Nassau. So, I really don't see that as cancelling the cruise even if Labadee wasn't available for whatever reason.AverageMetalDrummer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 7:09 am I just read an article discussing the possibility of gangs completely seizing power over the Haitian government. Some think this is becoming a real possibility, with reports stating criminal organizations are working to take control of the transitional government. My heart goes out to the people there; I truly hope the mission to take down the gangs is eventually successful.
While this idea has circulated before, I wonder what UMC’s response will be if the worst happens. I doubt that Labadee would be “safe” with Haiti under gang control. The agreement RC has with Haiti may become null and void. If Labadee becomes an unviable destination, what happens? Do we change destinations? Do we just float around for four days without a port day (I wouldn’t mind this at all)? Is the cruise canceled? I hope it’s not the latter. Thoughts?
I think at this point, the only port I'd bother leaving the ship for is Turks just to see what all the hype was about. Hopefully that's not where 2026 redirects to, since the chances of me being onbroad are extremely slim right now.AverageMetalDrummer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:06 pmGreat insight, I honestly had no clue what would happen. I’m at the point now where port locations don’t matter much to me. If it’s a truly shitty destination, I’ll just stay on the boat and rest like I did this year.toby wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 9:05 amTypically the charter agreement (and US law) requires that there be at least 1 non-US port required for docking. So, the only option would be to redirect to a different port should it come to that. There are plenty of options to fulfill that requirement. Absolute worst case would probably be something like Nassau. So, I really don't see that as cancelling the cruise even if Labadee wasn't available for whatever reason.AverageMetalDrummer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 7:09 am I just read an article discussing the possibility of gangs completely seizing power over the Haitian government. Some think this is becoming a real possibility, with reports stating criminal organizations are working to take control of the transitional government. My heart goes out to the people there; I truly hope the mission to take down the gangs is eventually successful.
While this idea has circulated before, I wonder what UMC’s response will be if the worst happens. I doubt that Labadee would be “safe” with Haiti under gang control. The agreement RC has with Haiti may become null and void. If Labadee becomes an unviable destination, what happens? Do we change destinations? Do we just float around for four days without a port day (I wouldn’t mind this at all)? Is the cruise canceled? I hope it’s not the latter. Thoughts?
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 5 guests
70000TONS, 70000TONS OF METAL and the 70000TONS OF METAL logo are registered trademarks of Properties of Metal Ltd. and are used under license.
© 2009-2024 UMCruises International Ltd. All Rights Reserved.